|
|
Total Number of Subscribers: 1626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 31st March 2010 |
Compiled by: M Sathya Kumar |
|
If a person runs a proprietary
business and is also a partner in another firm, turnovers of these two
entities cannot be clubbed. Section 44AB of the Income-Tax Act provides for an audit
of the accounts of a person whose turnover or gross sales exceeds Rs 40 lakh
per annum if the assessee is carrying on business or Rs 10 lakh of gross
receipts if the assessee is carrying on profession. The 2010 Budget proposes
to raise the limits to Rs 60 lakh and Rs 15 lakh respectively. The liability to tax audit arises only when income is
chargeable under the head “profits and gains from business or
profession”. Incomes derived under the other heads of income are not
includable. The liability is fixed on the person and not for a particular
business. In case a person runs two separate establishments — say, a
provision store and a travel agency — and if the turnover or gross
sales of these two put together exceed Rs 40 lakh per annum, the assessee
would be liable for tax audit. If a person runs a proprietary business and is also a
partner in another firm, turnovers of these two entities cannot be clubbed as
the partnership firm is a separate “person” by itself. If the turnover of the firm exceeds Rs 40 lakh, it is
only the firm which is subjected to tax audit. Partners of the firm are not
subjected to tax audit merely because the firm in which they are partners has
turnovers exceeding the limit. If a person is a professional and is practising as an
individual as well as a partner in a firm, the liability to tax audit of the
individual arises only when the gross receipts from the individual practice
exceeds Rs 10 lakh. If the partner draws a salary from the firm, the salary
so drawn is includable for determining the sum of Rs 10 lakh, since salary
from the firm is charged under the head ‘profits and gains from
business' and not as salaries. Share of income from the professional firm is
not taxable and, therefore, not includable. If the professional receives the fee after applicable tax
deduction, the gross value is to be considered, that is, adding back the tax
deducted at source. GROSS TURNOVER This term denotes the gross amounts flowing into the
kitty of the person. It only includes the amounts on which the person has
absolute right to deal with. It excludes the cash inflows which are held for
others. For example, in a chit fund company, it is only the
commission earned by it which is to be considered for determining the tax
audit liability and not the auction turnovers. Similarly, in the case of a commission agent, the income
to be reckoned would be the commission earned by him and not the sales
executed by him. In case of a consignment, the sales are affected by the
consignee on behalf of his principal and not on his own behalf. Therefore, the turnovers would be included in the hands
of the consignor and not the consignee. Only his commission would be
includable to determine if the consignee is liable to tax audit. In case of a stock broker, income by way of brokerage
only would be considered for the purposes of tax audit. The turnover executed
by him on behalf of his clients would not be considered. If he also
undertakes buying and selling of shares, the turnovers attributable to his
turnovers for himself would be clubbed to the gross brokerage earned by him. GROSS SALES The term used in the section is gross sales. If a person
has a sales of Rs 41 lakh and sales returns of Rs 1.5 lakh, the gross sales
of Rs 41 lakh is to be reckoned. That there have been sales returns of Rs 1.5
lakh and resultant turnover being less than Rs 40 lakh would not be a valid
contention. In a case where a shirt manufacturer had a contract with
a truck operator for transport of shirts to different parts of the country
and collected freight charges from its customers, It was held that the
transport charges collected from the customer, though billed separately,
would be includable in gross turnover as the contract with the transporter is
independent of the contract with the customer GROSS RECEIPTS In case of a professional, the threshold limit for tax
audit is Rs 10 lakh. If a professional raises a bill in two parts, say, one
for rendering the service and the other towards reimbursement of expenses,
the gross receipts would be the sum total of both the parts. Vocation is considered to be a part of profession.
Artistes or sportspersons, though not professionals by strict interpretation,
are liable to tax audit if their gross receipts exceed Rs 10 lakh. In case of a hospital, the turnover is inclusive of the
other services such as bed charges, service costs and cost of medicines
administered. Though the doctor is a professional, running the hospital is in
the nature of business and not carrying on profession. Hence the liability to
tax audit arises only on crossing the limit of Rs 40 lakh. If separate accounting is maintained for consultancy and
for other services rendered at the hospital, the doctor would be liable if
the consultancy receipts exceed Rs 10 lakh per annum, notwithstanding the
fact that the turnover of the hospital does not exceed Rs 40 lakh. But, if the doctor merely renders consultancy services,
he would be a professional and the limit of Rs 10 lakh would apply. His
income from teaching, income by way of writing in journals, newspapers, etc.,
would also be considered in determining the limit. Similarly, in case of a chartered accountant engaged in
other activities such as teaching, writing in newspapers and academic work
(such as setting of question papers, valuing the answer scripts, etc), all
these incomes should be clubbed to determine the liability for tax audit. Unlike a hospital, the chartered accountant is earning
by mere utilisation of professional skills. Therefore, he would be liable to
tax audit if the earnings exceed Rs 10 lakh.\ In case of an engineer, apart from consultations, the
income derived by designing is construed as profession and not business. But
if he executes a contract, turnover of Rs 40 lakh is to be considered, as it
involves other ingredients in addition to his professional knowledge. He
would rather qualify to be a contractor and not as a professional. A retired engineer taking classes at engineering
colleges would be liable to tax audit if his gross receipts from the college
exceeds Rs 10 lakh, based on the principle that vocation is a part of
profession. His other income from exercise of his professional knowledge such
as consultancy, designing, writing in technical journals, and so on, would be
clubbed for the limit of Rs 10 lakh. But if he is on an employment contract, the income gets
charged to tax under the head ‘salaries' and consequently there would
be no liability to tax audit even if the salary exceeds Rs 10 lakh per annum. In case of an assessee actively engaged in stock market
operations, profits or losses are chargeable to tax under the head profits
and gains from business and not under the head ‘capital gains'. He
would be liable to tax audit if the total turnover exceeds Rs 40 lakh. But a stray transaction, though exceeding Rs 40 lakh,
might be considered as capital gains and therefore not liable to tax audit. Article
by Kali Prasad, The author is a Hyderabad-based chartered accountant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewards
waiting for feedback at |
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: We believe that the information contained in this e-zine is true. If you do not wish to receive Smart Trainee please click here. |
|
|
|
|
|
Click here to contact us, if you are unable to view the content properly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
