|
|
Total Number of Subscribers: 1626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 04th May 2010 |
Compiled by: M Sathya Kumar |
|
An SEC official emphasizes management's responsibility
for understanding how fair-value measurements are made. Over the past year and a half, the Securities and
Exchange Commission has fielded a slew of questions from companies about the
fair-value measurement of financial assets and liabilities. Many requests for
guidance have involved auditing the assumptions and estimates used to
determine fair value. But few questioners have focused on management's
responsibility in the fair-value audit process, according to Marc Panucci, a
senior associate chief accountant at the SEC. The dearth of such questions is surprising, Panucci told
an audience last week at an audit-industry conference sponsored by Noting that management is also generally held
responsible for establishing effective internal controls over financial
reporting, Panucci said top executives must become comfortable with
assumptions and estimates provided by third-party valuation specialists.
Companies typically hire such specialists to determine the worth of
hard-to-value items, including thinly traded financial instruments, complex
securities, and goodwill. Most of the issuers and auditors that have approached
the SEC looking for guidance in this area were concerned with two issues,
said Panucci. First, what kind of evidential matter is required by the SEC
and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to back up assertions made
about securities traded in illiquid markets? Second, what evidence is
required to assure regulators that management understands the basis for
fair-value estimates provided by third-party specialists? The catalyst for such queries, said Panucci, likely was
the PCAOB's requirement that auditors must "obtain an understanding of
[management's] process for determining fair-value measurements and
disclosures," as well as the fact that there is no bright-line
definition of an "understanding." Indeed, to render an opinion, an
auditor must be comfortable with management's level of understanding with
regard to the assumptions made by third parties, he noted. Some valuation specialists, recognizing the demand for
more information around fair-value estimates, are obtaining SAS 70 Type II
audits, noted Panucci. A Type II audit examines the controls around the work
of an outside vendor that will be fed into the issuer's financial statements,
such as estimates. It's another means of assuring that management is
comfortable with the third party, said Panucci. "I am not saying that management has to recalculate
[estimates] or understand everything the specialist is doing," added
Panucci. But the SEC does expect management to understand how fair value is
being determined, how fair value affects the financial statements, and
whether the company is "truly managing the risk of restatement." If the company can't support its fair-value assertions,
then, Panucci advised, "management, the auditors, and outside counsel at
least have to take a step back and ask the question: How does that impact the
assessment on internal controls over financial reporting, and how does that
impact [Sarbanes-Oxley] certifications?" Article was earlier published in one of the
reputed financial daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewards
waiting for feedback at |
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: We believe that the information contained in this e-zine is true. If you do not wish to receive Smart Trainee please click here. |
|
|
|
|
|
Click here to contact us, if you are unable to view the content properly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|