|
|
Total Number of Subscribers: 464 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Date: 17th Sep 2009 |
Compiled by: M Sathya Kumar |
|
Modelling cost management maturity
Maturity level of cost management (CMM) must be an intimidating expression to those who strongly associate cost with accounting measurement of financial information for external or internal reporting. To understand CMM we must basically differentiate between cost accounting and cost management. Though cost management has cost as its central theme it does not make it a cost accounting subject. Rather, it is a comprehensive management philosophy for proactively managing the resources of the business by integrating it with the strategic and operational aspects. The ownership of this philosophy is company wide and considered as a process and not a function. Cost accounting, on the other hand, is an extension or manifestation of accounting subject intended to measure costs with reference to objects of costing such as products and customers and apply the same for external or internal reporting. Describing TCM Considering the importance of the cost management process as the heart of cost competitive strategies, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) has been positioning it as framework entitled Total Cost Management (TCM) quite persistently for the last seven years almost. It will be worthwhile therefore to consider a description of the TCM philosophy in the context of modelling its maturity level in enterprises. TCM can be described as a management planning and control system to be adopted by a firm to enable it to greatly enhance its competitiveness involving the following: Identifying and measuring the cost of resources consumed in performing the significant activities/processes of the firm. Determining the efficiency and effectiveness of the activities/processes performed. Identifying, evaluating and implementing the most appropriate methodologies to enhance the competitiveness of the firm with a view to achieve long term leadership. TCM involves selection and implementation of various tools of cost management as appropriate to the strategies and operations of the business. Before proceeding to describe the concept of maturity levels in TCM as being now propagated by CII, let us broadly understand some of the aspects of the cost management framework. The TCM framework is relevant for any business grouping. For example, the principles of target costing can be made applicable to the telecom sector inasmuch as they are applicable to the automobile sector. TCM exercise starts in fact from mapping of the processes to the strategies and operational targets of the firm. The tools of TCM are linked with reference to the strategies of the organisation as well as the operational needs to drive the cost strategies. It is not necessary that a firm need to implement all the TCM tools. The selection of the tool depends on the needs of the strategy. For example, a firm practising kaizen costing to reinforce TPM or TQM need not think of implementing activity management. TQM based continuous improvement efforts work through a root cause analysis at an activity level. Cost information at an activity level can also provide the trigger for the continuous improvement efforts under a TQM environment. One of the tools of TCM provides cost information at activity level and integrates with the TQM measures. TPM efforts focus on various pillars of improvement. Cost information is very crucial at the level of various projects undertaken against each pillar. TCM data being process oriented provides cost information which enables cost measurement at the pillar level and thus enhance TPM implementation. TCM can provide an ideal support for policy deployment in the domain of resource planning and its accountability in utilisation. Wherever the policy deployment is in respect of costs, the information structure in a TCM environment provides the ideal way of drilling down cost targets at process and activity level for accountability and ownership. There are almost five levels of maturity. These levels have been created by CII based on benchmarks set relevant to the level of competition in business. These levels and their attributes constitute the rest of this article. Maturity Levels There are five levels of maturity on cost management practices which have been identified after considerable study and discussions with experts. The numerical count of levels is also based on the archetype CMM model of software maturity. These five levels are presented in the Chart. The enterprise adopting the barest minimum of the best practices are considered to be at the minimal level and the best in class which can be an icon to others termed as exemplary. The features Minimal level: An enterprise which is at the bare minimum level of best practices of total cost management will have the following features: The cost management centres around the information extracted from the financial reporting mechanism and at best collected at cost centre level. Cost awareness as an ingredient of the competitive strategy is only at the top management level and has not percolated downwards. The cost information is incapable of addressing strategic business issues and chronic operational problems. Cost allocation as a part of cost accounting procedures if any focuses only on manufacturing or direct business processes in respect of the service sectors. Functional level: The maturity of an enterprise on cost management practices would be at functional level if it exhibits the following features: A good interfacing of information technology and the information needs as a result of which the needs of a cost management process are flown from the systems. The enterprise has a very good system for reckoning with the material cost structure for the products or any other direct costs if it is a service sector which also reveals the wastage taking place as potential area for cost control. The cost management would be defocused on costs other than raw material or direct costs such as human resources in the case of the IT sector. The continuous improvement processes of the enterprise are disconnected from the cost management and because of that cost management would not be driving operational improvements at a detail level. Though there could be some support for operational improvement at aggregated level, the cost management is absolutely in disconnect with the strategic decision making of the enterprise. Operational level: The cost management practices of an enterprise are supposed to be at an operational level if they demonstrate the following features: Both the financial accounting and the cost accounting mechanism would be well articulated and structured in the finance manuals of the enterprise with a great deal of synchronisation between the two. The cost accounting plan for raw materials and all other costs would be adopting the generally accepted cost accounting principles and, if applicable, well laid out cost accounting standards of a professional body. The operational improvement process of the enterprise is well integrated with the costing data base and the cost information is also seen driving improvement initiatives. The budgeting efforts of the enterprise as a part of sound financial management are well integrated with the cost management process. However, the business strategy issues analysis and decision making do not get a high quality support and enablement from the cost management system in use. TCM-enabled level The cost management practices of a TCM-enabled enterprise are at quite an advanced level as they have overcome all the negative hallmarks of the levels before. The cost management process features of a TCM-enabled enterprise are: All the good features of an operational level enterprise cost management system set out below exist in a TCM-enabled enterprise. All the data flows in a cost management structure are well integrated and are driven by an Enterprise Resource Planning software which makes full use of the cost management functionality available within or connected separately through a standalone module. Customer focus is brought in a very structured way and it forms a part of the cost management process by focusing on cost of serving the customer, customer groups or market segments. The operational improvement and the cost management reinforce each other in such a way that the results of the improvement process through a feedback loop updates the cost management system. A very good linkage is established between the strategic issues, decision-making process on them and the cost management system. The cost management system, as a matter of routine, enables a high quality analysis of the strategic issues of the enterprise. Exemplary The TCM-enabled enterprises eventually become Exemplary and would demonstrate the following features: Such enterprises would certainly exhibit all the features of a TCM-enabled enterprise first. By successful deployment of cost management, such companies would be the benchmark of the ideal cost structure of the sector they are operating and would become iconic in stature. There would be high level of integration between the enterprise risk management and cost management and as a result of that the competency to manage future cost structure is very high. These enterprises would be also having initiatives to extend the cost management practices into their inbound and outbound supply chain players. These enterprises also have integrated the environment management concerns with the cost management, and thus the management decision-making would also take into account the environment costs. Any best practice on environment management accounting would be fully adhered to. Assessment for level rating and benefits The CII has also set in motion a roadmap of assessing the levels of the enterprises on a voluntary basis and several of them have already been rated. The methodology consists of questionnaire to be filled to be followed by visits of well trained teams to perform the assessment. Several benefits are expected to accrue from the rating of the cost management process from the basic principle that this will act as a mechanism for assuring the presence of a performance management process as a part of the enterprise governance framework. In particular, the credit rating agencies and the investment funds can put a premium or higher marking for enterprises which are rated at a higher level of maturity as there is a lesser risk on performance management. It is expected that this maturity level model assumes a very high level of importance in the evolving days of cost competitive pressures. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Rewards waiting for feedback
at | |
|
| |
|
Disclaimer: We believe that the information contained in this e-zine is true. If you do not wish to receive Smart Trainee please click here. | |
|
| |
|
Click here to contact us, if you are unable to view the content properly | |
|
| |
|
| |