|
|
Total Number of Subscribers: 1635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: 8th March 2010 |
Compiled by: M Sathya Kumar |
|
Auditors say govt needs to clarify on net worth
requirement, calculation of income tax and applicability to NBFCs With just a
year to go before Indian companies bring their accounts in line with new
standards, experts say lack of clarity could lead to balance-sheet confusion,
misleading shareholders and investors. Accounting
standards in
IFRS has
been created by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB), an
independent, privately-funded standards body based in Aligning
with IFRS norms will help Indian companies raise cheaper capital overseas,
besides making foreign listings and setting up subsidiaries and joint
ventures abroad less cumbersome. Salman
Khursheed, minister of state in the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA),
reiterated that the new accounting system would start on time. “The
ministry has met its commitment of starting IFRS-compliant reporting by
2011,” he had said on 1 February at the inaugural function of the
Competition Commission of India’s new premises. “Finer issues, if
any, will be dealt with by the core group in detail.” The core
group was created by MCA to decide on issues relating to IFRS. The
ministry had announced a three-phase convergence schedule in January. In the
first phase, listed companies, including those on overseas exchanges, and
those with a net worth of Rs1,000 crore, will adopt IFRS standards in April
2011. The second
phase will comprise companies with a net worth of Rs500-1,000 crore, which
will move to IFRS starting April 2013. Listed companies having a net worth of
Rs500 crore or less will converge in April 2014. “The
announcement does not elaborate on when the net worth would be
determined,” said Jamil Khatri, head of accounting advisory services at
audit and consulting firm KPMG in He
suggested that companies start evaluating net worth according to existing
standards to determine whether it exceeds Rs1,000 crore. Those that qualify
should start preparing for new accounting standards on 1 April 2011, Khatri
said. Dolphy
D’souza, partner (assurance) at audit and consulting firm Ernst and Young Pvt. Ltd, said the process needs
to be kicked off early. “In my view, the test should be done based on
the balance date of 31 March 2009, because doing the net worth test based on
the balance sheet date on 31 March 2011 will leave entities with little or no
time to prepare for IFRS for the year 2011-12. MCA should confirm this by
guidance,” he said. D’souza
and Khatri also said it makes sense for companies to go in for IFRS
comparative numbers in 2010-11 although the ministry has not prescribed it,
as this is an IASB requirement from the following year onwards. “This
will help all stakeholders get a better idea about their companies as it will
give dual statement for compliance,” said D’souza. “This
will also help them go in for a robust reporting in the first quarter in
2011-12.” T.V.
Mohandas Pai, Infosys Technologies Ltd
director and member of the core group for accounting convergence, said all
the outstanding issues will be addressed soon. “The
core committee is fine- tuning various provisions for converging,” he
said. “In my opinion, there are no major glitches.” Khatri also
questioned whether companies going in for convergence in the first phase
would be able to announce consolidated accounts that include subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates. The
government also needs to clarify on the applicability of IFRS to non-banking
financial companies (NBFCs) because a separate road map is being devised for
banking and insurance companies. NBFCs, too,
are regulated by the Reserve Bank of Another
issue that needs to be clarified pertains to companies that have issued
foreign currency convertible bonds. “Just
like companies issuing American depository receipts and global depository
receipts have to converge in the first phase, will companies issuing these
also need to converge in the first round?” Khatri asked. With regard
to computation of income-tax, a committee has been set up by the Central
Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). “Income-tax
authorities will need time since changes will be very pervasive,”
D’souza said. “In my view, for some years to come entities should
be prepared to generate both Indian GAAP and IFRS numbers. IFRS for statutory
reporting and Indian GAAP for tax purposes.” Pai said
the CBDT committee will provide detailed guidelines shortly. Article was earlier published in one of the reputed
financial daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rewards
waiting for feedback at |
|
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: We believe that the information contained in this e-zine is true. If you do not wish to receive Smart Trainee please click here. |
|
|
|
|
|
Click here to contact us, if you are unable to view the content properly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|