|
|
Total Number of Subscribers: 464 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
Date:23rd Febraury 2009 |
Compiled by Mr. M. Sathya Kumar | |
|
|
The Incarnation of IFRS - How is it came in to being ! IFRS has proved to be the right catalyst for driving change towards this global convergence of accounting GAAP International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are emerging as the primary accounting language of the world. At least 100 countries have already adopted IFRS and 30 others have declared their intention to adopt or converge with IFRS over the next two-three years. Here’s how it all started.
The history of International Accounting Standards (IAS, or
international GAAP, or generally accepted accounting principles) goes back
to 1967, when a study group was established comprising key accounting
bodies from the UK, the US and Canada. This study group went on to become
the International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC), which was
instrumental in rolling out IAS. IASC resulted from an agreement between
the accountancy bodies of 10 countries: the US, Canada, Mexico, the UK,
Ireland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Japan and Australia. As its
membership grew, IASC also developed close interaction with global
economic bodies such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, the World Bank, the United Nations, the Asian Development
Bank and the International Organization of Securities Commissions
(Iosco).
IASC had its first formal meeting with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in 1984, and started its comparability project with US
GAAP in 1987. As businesses became transnational, companies and investors
started realizing the importance of having one set of global accounting
standards. In 1996, the US Congress acknowledged the need for a
high-quality comprehensive international accounting standard. By 1998,
more than 100 countries had become IASC members, and some European
countries passed laws permitting large companies to use IAS for domestic
reporting and filing purposes. A year later, Iosco supported the use of
IASC standards by multinational firms for cross-border offerings and
listings. In 2001, the European Commission (EC) legislated use of IAS for
all listed companies from 2005, and set the ball rolling for IAS.
In 2001, IASC was rechristened the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB), with Sir David Tweedie as chairman. IASB and the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the principal US body for setting
accounting standards, concluded the Norwalk Agreement in 2002 which laid
down a framework for bridging the gap between IAS and US GAAP. The first
IFRS was published in June 2003, titled “IFRS 1—First-time Adoption of
International Financial Reporting Standards”.
The epicentre for world economic growth was then moving elsewhere
from the US—particularly West Asia, Latin America, Africa, India and
China. Many of these countries at some point in history were under
European colonial rule and influence. The local GAAP in these countries
were and are mirror images of various European acceptable principles such
as UK GAAP, French GAAP or German GAAP. For example, in India, the
accounting standards and Companies Act were largely modelled on the UK
lines. In fact, some Indian standards are almost replicas of the UK IAS
standards.
For a long time, multiple versions of GAAP existed in Europe as its
countries were divided. It took some time for Europe to get its act
together. This was followed by the unification of European economies (EU)
and emergence of the euro as an alternative currency to the US dollar.
Over the next five-six years, the euro and IFRS became synonymous with the
EU. With IFRS gaining prominence in European markets, it became relatively
easier for most countries across Latin America, Africa and Asia to tag
along. It was relatively easier and a next logical step for these emerging
economies to embrace IFRS rather than US GAAP.
Events in the US also did not help US GAAP. The dot-com bust and
rigorous Sarbanes-Oxley compliances made the US markets vulnerable and
shook investor confidence worldwide. Being a new initiative, IFRS was more
contemporary and able to adequately reflect the changing needs of business
and investors. Also, being principle-based, it offered a more
comprehensive solution vis-a-vis US GAAP, which is largely rule-based, too
voluminous and cumbersome.
By 2006, more than 100 foreign private issuers had registered with
SEC. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and SEC could
see that, with strong global support for IFRS, it would be difficult for
the US to remain isolated. In November 2007, SEC allowed foreign private
issuers listed in the US to file IFRS financial statements without any
reconciliation with US GAAP. It took its most significant step on 27
August when it proposed a road map for IFRS adoption in the US. Although
it delays adoption for a majority of the companies until 2014, it also
permits large US firms (some 100 of them meeting specified criteria) to
file IFRS financial statements with SEC for the years ending on or after
15 December 2009. With this, IFRS may have conquered the last stumbling
block in its journey towards being a truly global standard.
What enabled IFRS to come into existence was the long-felt need for
unification of business systems and financial reporting platforms, greater
comparability of financial results and free movement of financial and
human capital. Investors, stakeholders and corporate managements were
tiring of multiple GAAP reporting and reconciliations. IFRS has proved to
be the right catalyst for driving change towards this global convergence
of accounting GAAP.
Article by Navin Agrawal , director with Ernst and Young India Pvt.
Ltd. | |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
|
|
Rewards waiting for feedback
at | |
|
|
| |
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
|
Disclaimer: We believe that the information contained in this e-zine is true. If you do not wish to receive Smart Trainee please click here. | |
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
|
Click here to contact us, if you are unable to view the content properly | |
|
|
| |