|
|
Total Number of Subscribers: 464 | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
Date: 22nd August 2008 |
Compiled by Mr. M. Sathya Kumar | |
|
|
S. 139 of the Income-tax Act dealing with the procedure for filing Annual Return of Income by assessees has been amended from time to time. The Finance Act, 2003, has inserted new Ss.(1B) w.e.f. 1-4-2003 to enable an assessee, having income from ‘Salaries, House Property, Business, Profession, etc.’ to file the return of income on a floppy, diskette, magnetic cartridge tape, CD-ROM or any other computer media. For this purpose, the procedure was to be notified by Rules. CBDT had issued a Notification No. F-856(E) on 25-7-2003 giving a scheme for filing the e-return for assessees having only income under the head ‘Salaries’. This scheme has been revised and two Notifications Nos. 1073(E) and 1074(E) dated 30-9-2004 [270 ITR (ST) (37)] have been issued and they apply to returns of income for A.Y. 2004-05 and subsequent years. It may be noted that this scheme for Electronic Furnishing of Return of Income is optional. Therefore, assessees who do not wish to avail of the facility for filing e-returns, can file their returns of income in the normal manner as hitherto done. Although this new scheme of filing e-returns is made applicable from A.Y. 2004-2005, the Notifications dated 30-9-2004 have come to the knowledge of the professionals and assessees sometime in late October, 2004 when most of the returns of income were finalised and were ready for filing. Moreover, there was no sufficient time to complete the formalities as per these Notifications. Therefore, advantage of this new scheme can be taken for filing e-return of income for A.Y. 2005-2006 and subsequent years.
2.1 As stated above, the CBDT has issued two separate Notifications on 30-9-2004. The first Notification No. 1073(E) deals with Scheme for filing e-returns by assessees having income from house property, business, profession, income from other sources, salaries, capital gains, etc. At present, the scheme is restricted to assessees, who are assessed or are assessable to tax at any of the cities specified in Schedule ‘A’ of the Notification. This schedule gives a list of 60 cities. All capital cities of major States and other large cities in all States find place in this list. 2.2 The second Notification No. 1074(E) deals with the Scheme for individuals having income from salaries, but do not have income from business or profession. In other words, assessees having income from salaries and income from house property, capital gains and income from other sources can take advantage of this scheme. At present, the scheme applies to individuals, who are assessed or are assessable to tax in the 60 cities referred to in the first Notification. 2.3 The benefit of the above schemes can be taken only by assessees who have been allotted PAN and are assessed or are assessable in the above 60 cities.
The scheme under the first Notification provides for filing e-returns through an e-return intermediary. For this purpose, e-return intermediary is defined in para 5 of the Notification as under :
(i) It must be an employer, being a registered company or a statutory body, who :
(ii) It is a registered company, including a bank, having a net worth of Rs.5 crores or more and is engaged in the business of providing financial services during the last 5 years..
It may be noted that the intermediary or its principal officer must not have been convicted for any professional misconduct, fraud, or embezzlement or any criminal offence by any Court in India or by any professional body. Since no time limit is stated, there should be no such conviction at any time in the past.
The intermediary is required to set up and commission the hard-ware and software resources as mentioned in Schedule ‘B’ of the scheme. This requirement is as under :
The intermediary should also provide the following facility :
A person who wishes to be appointed as an intermediary has to apply to the Registrar appointed under this scheme, along with such application fee and refundable security deposit as fixed by the administrator. The Registrar shall verify the particulars given by the applicant and carry out due diligence of the applicant through an agency empanelled by CBDT for this purpose. This is to ensure that the applicant has set up and commissioned the necessary hardware and software resources. The Registrar has to transmit this application and due diligence report on-line to the administrator, who will issue appointment order along with the ‘The E-return Intermediary Identification Number’ and password to enable the applicant to act as an intermediary. This appointment will be valid for a period of 2 years, which may be extended for a further period of 2 years.
An assessee who desires to furnish his return under this scheme, will have to ensure that he is eligible to file the return under the scheme. He has to give an authority to the intermediary to act as his agent for the purpose of furnishing his e-return for the relevant year. He has to furnish a paper return of income with all its enclosures duly verified by him. It is possible for the intermediary to prepare the paper return on the basis of information furnished by the eligible person.
Para 8 of the scheme provides for detailed procedure for filing e-return by the intermediary. In brief, this procedure is as under :
From the above, it will be noticed that the date of filing of the return under the scheme will be the date of issue of provisional receipt as stated in 4.2 (iv). Thereafter, the intermediary has to file paper return with the Assessing Officer within 15 days. If there is a delay in filing paper return on the part of the intermediary, the assessee will have to suffer the consequences of filing delayed return after the due date. This will mean that if the due date for filing the return u/s. 139(1) is 31st October, the assessee will have to give the paper return duly completed to the intermediary at least 10 to 15 days before the due date. There is no time limit for the administrator to issue the provisional receipt. Therefore, even if the intermediary files valid e-return by 25th October but there is delay on the part of the administrator and the provisional receipt is given on 2nd November, the assessee will be deemed to have filed the return late. Morever, even if the provisional receipt is given on 30th October but the intermediary files the paper return with the Assessing Officer on 16th November, the return will be deemed to have been filed on 16th November. The consequences of such delayed filing of the return will be that if the assessee has declared loss in the return, the same will not be allowed to be carried forward. There will be liability for payment of interest u/s.234A in other cases. This will mean that the assessee is penalised for no fault of his. To this extent, this provision for determining the date of filing of return is most inequitable. If this scheme is to be made more meaningful, the date of filing of return should be taken as the date on which the paper return is received by the intermediary or alternatively date on which the intermediary has uploaded the completed return of income to the administrator under para 8(2) of the scheme. It may be noted that tax audit report u/s.44AB is also required to be filed with the return of income before the due date. If there is a delay in filing this report, penalty is chargeable u/s.271B. There is no mention in this scheme about the manner in which tax audit report u/s.44AB is to be filed. If it is to be filed with the paper return by the intermediary, the delay in filing return, as explained above, on the part of the administrator in issuing provisional receipt or on the part of the intermediary in filing the paper return with the Assessing Officer will invite penal action u/s.271B and the assessee will suffer due to no fault of his. It appears that if the paper return with tax audit report is ready well before the due date and is to be handed over to the intermediary before the due date for filing the return, no assessee would like to avail the benefit of this scheme and incur cost in the form of professional fees of the intermediary, if he has to take the risk of penal action for the delay caused by the intermediary or the administrator in the completion of the process under this scheme.
Para 10 of the scheme provides for functions and responsibilities of the intermediary. It provides that he should :
The administrator is to be appointed by CBDT to administer this scheme. He will be an Officer not below the rank of Commissioner of Income-tax. He has to specify the procedure, formats and standards for ensuring secure capture and transmission of data. He has to ensure compliance with the technical requirements of the scheme by the intermediary. He shall also be responsible for evolving and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval policies for proper and secure implementation of this scheme. In other words, he will be responsible for the day-to-day administration of the scheme.
Monitoring Committee is to be appointed by CBDT to assist it in the implementation of this scheme. This will consist of (i) the e-return administrator, (ii) representative of ICAI, (iii) representative of NASSCOM and (iv) a person having special knowledge and experience in the field of information technology. This Committee will advise the CBDT on the following matters :
8.1 As stated earlier, Notification No. 1074(E) issued by the CBDT deals with assessees having income from salary and other sources other than income from business or profession. This scheme applies to an assessee who is an individual and who has been allotted PAN. Moreover, he should be assessed or assessable in any of the 60 cities listed in Schedule ‘A’. This scheme is simple inasmuch as there is no e-return intermediary and the assessee can file e-return himself through the internet. This scheme comes into force w.e.f. A.Y. 2004-05 and is optional so that an assessee, who does not want to avail of the benefit of this scheme, can file paper return with the Assessing Officer.
Para 5 of the scheme provides for the following procedure :
Both the above schemes provide that the return filed under the scheme will be processed on priority basis. The refund, if any, due to the assessee shall be either credited to his account using the ECS method or sent directly to the assessee.
From the above discussion, it is evident that the first scheme is a complicated one. CBDT has tried to incorporate too many checks and balances. The second scheme is simpler and the assessee himself can file the return through the internet. The second scheme should have been made applicable to assessees, who have no income from salaries but have income from house property, other sources and capital gains only. Chartered Accountants, who are engaged in the field of Direct Tax practice, will now get an opportunity to enter into this new field of professional practice as e-return intermediaries. They will have to set up internet facilities as provided in the scheme and have a separate dedicated qualified staff for this purpose. It is not clear why there should be a requirement for filing a paper return after e-return is submitted in time. When the responsibility is given to the intermediary for verification of paper return before submitting e-return, there does not appear any need for the paper return to be filed with the Assessing Officer. By this scheme the paper-work in the Income-tax Office will not be reduced. On the contrary, it will increase. Moreover, the date of filing the return is to be determined by the date when the provisional receipt is issued by the administrator or the date of filing of paper return by the intermediary. If there is delay on the part of the administrator or on the part of the intermediary, the assessee will suffer. This is a very inequitable provision. If the Government wants to make this scheme popular and simplify the procedure, the e-return submitted by the intermediary should be accepted as final. The policy of the CBDT is to accept 98% of the returns as they are filed. Therefore, the AO can call for the detailed paper return from the intermediary only if a case is taken up for scrutiny. In other cases, the paper return should not be called for. The intermediary should be asked to preserve the paper return and its an-nexures for a period of 2 or 3 years. Article by Mr. P. N. Shah Chartered Accountant | |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
|
|
Rewards waiting for feedback
at | |
|
|
| |
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
|
Disclaimer: We believe that the information contained in this e-zine is true. If you do not wish to receive Smart Trainee please click here. | |
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
|
Click here to contact us, if you are unable to view the content properly | |
|
|
| |